Insights 8.28

Comment

Insights 8.28

Design:

  • Music production programs may contain the most intensely (and anachronistically) skeuomorphic interface designs of any professional software class. While the "honesty" of flat design has swept across many domains, music software remains a stubborn holdout that feels baroque in its artificial depth and rich gradients. While the current UI trend is minimal, flat, and loaded with white space, it seems wrong to dismiss these highly textured interfaces as bad just because they are swimming against the aesthetic currents of the moment. If it adds to confusion, then sure, those are bad interfaces - but in many cases the homogeneity of flat designs can be equally confounding. Rather than subscribing to any one set of visual conventions, designers should focus on making products and services work well for their users.

 

Machines for Moving: 

 

Virtually There: 

 

Communication: 

 

Building Things: 

 

More next week. 

Comment

Insights 8.21

Comment

Insights 8.21

Design:

  • A designer has built himself a (formerly) secret little studio underneath a bridge. While it's got performative portfolio fodder written all over it, it's also a lovely project that gets at real questions of untapped spaces, the informal social aspects of infrastructure, and how little publicly accessible space is legally accessible to the public- and for anyone who seeks solitude within a populous city it's a tempting daydream of what could be. 

 

Machines for Moving: 

  • Leave-it-anywhere bike share programs sound great in theory: lots of flexibility for riders in a way that maps human activity instead of property developer interests, but the reality is more complex. Human transportation (whether packed subway car, traffic jam or cyclists jockeying in their narrow bike lanes) is more than a logistics problem- it's all about following a set of tacit social norms. Scott Smith has a thoughtful post about how the "leave-it-anywhere" bikes bring their own set of nudges and knocks to the fabric of our urban transportation landscape. Part of the complication here is the intrusion of private companies (who may or may not be scraping data and reselling it) letting public spaces get entangled in their systems without participating in those places themselves, only showing up, deploying a technology and running off. It's akin to Australia's problems of the cane toad, where an outside idea that's supposed to fix a pesky local problem only ends up supplanting it with it its own unique and unfamiliar headache.

 

The Engineered Earth: 

 

Energy: 

 

More next week. 

Comment

Insights 8.11

Comment

Insights 8.11

Design:

  

Labor Pains: 

  • One of the big "Web 2.0" concepts was the notion that creators could cut out greedy middlemen and reach global audiences directly, on their terms, and empower a whole new set of artists, writers, and musicians. For the most part that concept hasn't played out according the utopian-creator vision, rather the winners have been the fast-growing startups grabbing up content for aggregation, accruing massive audiences and paying out pennies to the authors (if anything at all). One notable exception is Patreon, a platform that hosts some 50,000 creators with a much more direct and transparent audience-to-builder payment process than say, YouTube or Spotify. The Verge has a solid piece profiling the platform, a handful of creators and some critics of the practice. The main concerns are around managing the expectations of a fan-hive that pays out money in dribs and drabs- that one must become not just a great musician or writer, but a great walking, talking, human brand that people can identify with which can mean truncating the true complexity of a person and their experiences. As with the rise of "personal brands" to maximize career opportunities and income, professionals of all stripes find themselves doing more and more performative work to demonstrate value, along with fulfilling the labor of their actual job descriptions. 

 

Just A Game: 

 

Up in the Air: 

 

Bias and Brains: 

 

  

More next week. 

Comment